ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

When Curiosity and High Class Meet: A Psychological Critical Analysis of A Rose for Emily

Essay by   •  February 7, 2011  •  Research Paper  •  1,298 Words (6 Pages)  •  1,742 Views

Essay Preview: When Curiosity and High Class Meet: A Psychological Critical Analysis of A Rose for Emily

Report this essay
Page 1 of 6

Eidt 1

English 113, D3

29 November 2007

When Curiosity and High Class Meet: A Psychological Critical Analysis of “A Rose for Emily”

“A Rose for Emily” is an interesting tale about a small town spinster who leads a somewhat

secret life. The narrator in the story is not a single person but the voice of the community itself. The

whole story is told in parts of her life about strange things that happened and how the community

handled it.

The community in “A Rose for Emily” gives us the impression that they are watching Emily

Griersons whole life from across the street. While reading the work we are made to feel like someone

inquiring about Emily Grierson, asking the town about her life, and somehow going back in time. The

community tells of times of the old south during the Civil War, and the gentile manner of the people

who lived there. The voice tells us of the old southern town of Jefferson. Time moves on but Emily

Grierson seems to stay in the past along with her property. “When the town got free postal delivery,”

we are told, “Miss Emily alone refused to let them fasten the metal numbers above her door and attach a

mailbox to it. She would not listen” (599). In the beginning of the story we learn through the narrative

voice of the community that the city officials had all retired and new ones had come in. Someone found

that Emily had not paid taxes in years because a Colonel Sartoris had remitted her taxes when her father

died to relieve some financial strain. The mayor did not like this so he sent people out to inform her that

Eidt 2

she had not paid her taxes. The voice of the community reports a dialog in which, after much protesting

with her she finally says, “See Colonel Sartoris”, then we are told in confidence, “ (Colonel Sartoris had

been dead almost ten years)” (596). These men were only interested in collecting her taxes and did not

care about an old agreement, “…for the new generation” as Ray B. West Jr. notes, “ the word of Colonel

Sartoris meant nothing.” (266).After her death, the community describes her as, “…[passing] from

generation to generation-dear, inescapable, impervious, tranquil, and perverse” (600).

The people of the antebellum town of Jefferson were incredibly critical and particular about the

matters of the town’s existence. When it comes to Emily Grierson’s personal life, everyone seems to

have something to say. Everything from the paint on the house to the way it smelled was scrutinized.

The voice of the community describes the house as, “…[a] big squarish frame house that had once been

white…lifting its stubborn and coquettish decay above cotton wagons and the gasoline pumps an

eyesore among eyesores” (595). This decaying of her house shows her decaying mental state along with

the decaying of herself as she grows older. As Kvita Newvell explains, “Not only does this symbolize

the decay of Emily physically but it symbolizes the decay of Emily; mentally” (par 23).When an odor

began to permeate at Emily’s house the town women watched closely and made a cruel comment toward

one of Emily’s servants, “Just as if a man…could keep a kitchen properly” (596). One woman further

inquires about the issue by going to a judge and complaining about Emily Grierson. When the judge

asks her, “But what will you have me to about it, madam?” the woman responds,“Why send her word to

stop it…Isn’t there a law?” (596). The town officials met, “…four men crossed Miss Emily’s lawn and

slunk about the house like burglars…They broke open the cellar door and sprinkled lime thereвЂ¦Ð²Ð‚Ñœ

(596).Not only had the community taken the matter of her house into their own hands, but the town

meddled in her personal life as well. The community was glad when they first saw her courting a man by

Eidt 3

the name of Homer Barron after her fathers death. But it soon turned sour when the town disapproved of

his behavior with other men. According to Michael L. Burduck, “The females in town…are so

concerned with Emily’s eccentricities that they force their men to actвЂ¦Ð²Ð‚Ñœ (260). Some of the women

went to the Baptist minister and persuaded him to talk to Emily and ask her not court Homer Barron, he

complied

...

...

Download as:   txt (8.7 Kb)   pdf (119.5 Kb)   docx (13.6 Kb)  
Continue for 5 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com
Citation Generator

(2011, 02). When Curiosity and High Class Meet: A Psychological Critical Analysis of A Rose for Emily. ReviewEssays.com. Retrieved 02, 2011, from https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/When-Curiosity-and-High-Class-Meet-A-Psychological/34509.html

"When Curiosity and High Class Meet: A Psychological Critical Analysis of A Rose for Emily" ReviewEssays.com. 02 2011. 2011. 02 2011 <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/When-Curiosity-and-High-Class-Meet-A-Psychological/34509.html>.

"When Curiosity and High Class Meet: A Psychological Critical Analysis of A Rose for Emily." ReviewEssays.com. ReviewEssays.com, 02 2011. Web. 02 2011. <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/When-Curiosity-and-High-Class-Meet-A-Psychological/34509.html>.

"When Curiosity and High Class Meet: A Psychological Critical Analysis of A Rose for Emily." ReviewEssays.com. 02, 2011. Accessed 02, 2011. https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/When-Curiosity-and-High-Class-Meet-A-Psychological/34509.html.