ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

Todd Vs. Rush County Schools

Essay by   •  December 28, 2010  •  Essay  •  691 Words (3 Pages)  •  1,413 Views

Essay Preview: Todd Vs. Rush County Schools

Report this essay
Page 1 of 3

Todd v Rush County Schools

133 F.3d 984

This suit was filed by four parents and as next friends for their four children, all students at Rushville Consolidated High School in Rushville, Indiana. In August 1996, the Rush County School Board approved a program prohibiting a high school student from participating in any extracurricular activities or driving to and from school unless the student and parent or guardian consented to a test for drugs, alcohol or tobacco in random, unannounced urinalysis examinations. Extracurricular activities include athletic teams, Student Council, Foreign Language Clubs, Fellowship of Christian Athletes, Future Farmers of America Officers and the Library Club. When consent for testing is given, participation in the extracurricular organizations or driving to and from school are permitted. Midwest Toxicology Services, which collects the samples, and the Witham Hospital Laboratory Services, which performs the analyses, conduct the testing. The $30 test is paid for by a grant.

If a test result is positive, the student and family are informed and permitted to explain the result by showing, for example, that the student is taking a medication that would influence the result. Without a satisfactory explanation, the student is barred from extracurricular activities or driving to and from school until passing a retest. However, a positive test result is not to be used in school discipline proceedings. If a student tests positive, the student and his or her parents will be given the names of agencies that might assist the student's recovery. Also if a student tests positive, he or she may request a new urine test. Otherwise the student may be retested after an appropriate interval but will continue to be barred from extracurricular activities and driving to and from school until testing negative.

This program concerns random suspicion less testing. The high school does reserve the right to test any student if it has reasonable suspicion of drug use. If a student tests positive twice, the school is deemed to have reasonable suspicion justifying further retests even though the student will no longer be permitted to engage in any extracurricular activities due to the prior positive results. Tests based on reasonable suspicion, unlike the suspicion less tests, can be punishable by the school.

This case was initiated by the students' and parents' complaint and activated by their motion

...

...

Download as:   txt (4 Kb)   pdf (71.4 Kb)   docx (10.1 Kb)  
Continue for 2 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com
Citation Generator

(2010, 12). Todd Vs. Rush County Schools. ReviewEssays.com. Retrieved 12, 2010, from https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Todd-Vs-Rush-County-Schools/27717.html

"Todd Vs. Rush County Schools" ReviewEssays.com. 12 2010. 2010. 12 2010 <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Todd-Vs-Rush-County-Schools/27717.html>.

"Todd Vs. Rush County Schools." ReviewEssays.com. ReviewEssays.com, 12 2010. Web. 12 2010. <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Todd-Vs-Rush-County-Schools/27717.html>.

"Todd Vs. Rush County Schools." ReviewEssays.com. 12, 2010. Accessed 12, 2010. https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Todd-Vs-Rush-County-Schools/27717.html.