ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

The Science, Philosophy and Religion of Matter

Essay by   •  February 15, 2011  •  Research Paper  •  2,644 Words (11 Pages)  •  1,290 Views

Essay Preview: The Science, Philosophy and Religion of Matter

Report this essay
Page 1 of 11

The Science, Philosophy and Religion of Matter

What exactly is matter, it is not an every day question that one asks one's own self. When looked at there are many different views on this subject, however because of the numerous numbers of different views, it is only possible to look at three of the discourses. The three discourses of matter to be looked at are; the Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical. Each discourse has evolved through time into the views that we know, and accept today. The distinction between these views on matter differs greatly, however it is possible to say that all three views came from the same place. This place being ancient Greece; it was their belief in gods that brought about religion, philosophy, and then science.

The scientific view of matter has evolved over time. Science for many centuries has been accompanied by philosophical thought, throughout time the mixture of the two is very evident. The beginnings of western science, namely physics, coincide with that of the first period of Greek philosophers. The basic ideas evolved from the Greek philosophers, and philosophy remained a big part of science right up until the Newtonian view of the universe. Newton had a mechanistic view of the universe. He saw the universe as a three dimensional space. This space was unchangeable and always stagnant.

In Newtons own words, "Absolute space, in its own nature, without regard to anything external, remains always similar and immovable." All changes in the physical world were described in terms of a separate dimension, called time, which again was absolute, having no connection to the material world and flowing smoothly, from the past through the present to the future.

The things, which made up the absolute space and time, were material particles. These were perceived by Newton to be a part of all matter, as well as indestructible. Newton's views were very parallel to those of the early Greek atomists. Both were based on the distinction between the full and the void, between matter and space, and in both models the particles remained always identical in their mass and shape.

The difference between these two views came in the forces that acted upon the particles. The early Greeks did not elaborate on these forces, they merely accepted that there are forces that do act upon particles. Newton thought that it was the force of gravity that acted upon the particles. He also thought that God created the particles and the forces that act upon them.

Newton's theory of a mechanistic universe was extremely popular with the physicists of the early nineteenth century. Newton's laws were seen as the basic laws of nature, however in less than a century, a new set of theories of physical reality was discovered and the limitations of Newton's theories were exposed.

This new physical reality was no doubt the work of Einstein, but it was not entirely his. There were some other key scientists whose work contributed to that of Einstein's. Their names were Michael Faraday and Clerk Maxwell. Faraday was responsible for producing an electric current through a copper wire, and together with Maxwell they both produced a complete theory of electromagnetism. Instead of saying that two charges had an attraction towards each other, they felt it more necessary to say that they disturbed each other. This led to the theory of a force that is called a field. This was a most profound change in mans conception of physical reality. In the Newtonian view, the forces were rigidly connected with the bodies they act upon.

Maxwell tried to explain his theories in mechanical terms, interpreting the fields as states of mechanical stress in a very light space-filling medium, called ether, and the electromagnetic waves as elastic waves of this ether. Maxwell did not focus on the field entities of his theories, but instead on the mechanistic entities. Einstein focused on the fields, and stated that no ether existed, yet that these electromagnetic fields were physical entities themselves. He also stated that they were able to travel through empty space, and explanation through a mechanical view was impossible.

In 1905 Einstein changed the world of science with his two theories which started modern physics. These theories were the quantum theory, and the theory of relativity. The quantum theory was a new way of looking at electromagnetic radiation. The relativity theory stated that, space is not three dimensional and time is not a separate entity. Both are intimately connected and form a four-dimensional continuum, space-time.

So the view of matter has evolved from the Greeks to Newton, to Einstein. The Greeks believed that there were basic building blocks which they called Atoms, however they did not look any deeper into what the Atoms were made of. Newton went a bit farther by introducing the concept of forces, which acted on these Atoms, he also felt that matter is always conserved and is essentially passive. These forces were an attraction towards each other.

Maxwell and Clerk went further by introducing the idea of a field created by the Atoms, and instead of an attraction, they believed that there was a disturbance. And finally Einstein developed the quantum theory and the theory of relativity. In the twentieth century, with the development of X-rays, the structure of the atom has been revealed. Now the Atom itself is not the smallest possible physical form, yet the substances which make up the Atom, such as electrons and protons and the nucleus, are now the smallest physical entities.

TodayÐ"†s view of matter is very confusing and complex. Matter as well as light can consist of waves or particles; this idea gives matter a dual entity. At subatomic levels matter shows tendencies to exist, the quantum theory expresses these tendencies as probabilities; that is to say that matter can come in and out of existence. This is the reason why matter can be both a wave and a particle.

The scientific view of a vacuum is this. A vacuum is not empty by any means, instead it is full of an infinite number of particles, which can enter existence and vanish without end. The reason for this view, according to scientists, is that it is possible for particles to exit and enter the void. That is, it is possible for particles to disappear and reappear at random. The science view of emptiness is that there are no empty spaces. This is explained by the same reasons as to why a vacuum is not empty. Which means that there is no such thing as nothingness or non-existence.

The philosophical view of matter starts off with the Milesian school of philosophy, and works

...

...

Download as:   txt (14.9 Kb)   pdf (188.1 Kb)   docx (14.6 Kb)  
Continue for 10 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com
Citation Generator

(2011, 02). The Science, Philosophy and Religion of Matter. ReviewEssays.com. Retrieved 02, 2011, from https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/The-Science-Philosophy-and-Religion-of-Matter/38687.html

"The Science, Philosophy and Religion of Matter" ReviewEssays.com. 02 2011. 2011. 02 2011 <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/The-Science-Philosophy-and-Religion-of-Matter/38687.html>.

"The Science, Philosophy and Religion of Matter." ReviewEssays.com. ReviewEssays.com, 02 2011. Web. 02 2011. <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/The-Science-Philosophy-and-Religion-of-Matter/38687.html>.

"The Science, Philosophy and Religion of Matter." ReviewEssays.com. 02, 2011. Accessed 02, 2011. https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/The-Science-Philosophy-and-Religion-of-Matter/38687.html.