ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

The Governments and States of Locke, Aquinas, and St. Augustine

Essay by   •  November 1, 2010  •  Essay  •  1,408 Words (6 Pages)  •  1,836 Views

Essay Preview: The Governments and States of Locke, Aquinas, and St. Augustine

Report this essay
Page 1 of 6

In John Locke's Second Treatise of Government, he identifies a government that is of the peoples consent with his essential raison d΄Ð"Єtre being the preservation and protection of personal property. This type of government is extremely comparable with the type of government that St. Augustine describes in his work City of God, while at the same time contrasts the views of Aquinas in the ways a state should operate. The end goal of how each of these philosophers' states purposes presents the greatest split between each of their philosophies. To understand how each of these philosophers' states are similar and different from each other, a deeper analysis is necessary.

The first and possibly most striking similarity between the states that both Locke and St. Augustine propose lies in the fact that both see the state as a necessary evil. Locke describes the perfect life as one in the "state of nature", where there are limitless boundaries to freedom. Within these limitless boundaries to do whatever you want lays the ability for others to do harm to you and your property, because they have complete freedom as well. In order to overcome this lack of security, Locke describes the state as a necessary evil which one must give up certain freedoms in order to be protected under the rule of law. This is similar to St. Augustine in the respect that within the world there are evil men who will do harm to others. Augustine argues that laws are necessary to make sure that people can live with the peace of mind that they are protected from the sins of others.

One of the contrasting points the states of Aquinas and Locke possess is rooted in how each state should set up and decide their laws. Aquinas argues that we should set up our laws based on high morals, which all men could agree on, and on the high ideals of natural law. Locke disagrees with this in the respect that all men are Tabula Rasa, which begin life as blank slates and develop their views and ideas based on the experiences they are exposed to. According to Locke the men in the state of Aquinas would all have different experiences and place importance on different morals and ideals. Therefore, Locke argues that in order to have a legitimate set of laws, they must be based on very solid foundations which cannot be subject to argument. Such foundations would be the protection of property, as well as the preservation of an individual's personal rights and freedoms.

The role of the government in the eyes of Locke is very simple. It is to protect the "peace, safety, security, and public good of the people". Locke arrives at this conclusion from the reasoning behind leaving the "state of nature" and entering civil society. We leave the "state of nature" (perfect freedom and perfect equality) in order to be free from being infringed upon by others. Although we must give up some of our freedoms for protection, they are small compared to the benefits of protection that we receive from civil society. To simplify things, we can simply refer to the role of government as to protect our private property. This private property includes our lives, personal rights, and physical objects. In order for the government to be doing its job correctly, Locke believes that all three of these must be protected.

Aquinas is contrary to Locke in the respect that he believes the primary role of the government is to make its citizens better people. Aquinas believes that the citizens of a state will become moral if they are repeatedly forced to abide by laws that are based on virtue. According to Aquinas, man is a being that succumbs to sin. In order to make man more moral he needs to be constantly reminded of rules that are virtuous in their own right. The purpose behind these virtuous rules is that if man is forced to encounter them of a regular basis, eventually they will "rub off" of him and he will become virtuous himself. Aquinas would even say that the virtues that would be made into laws are divine, and to go against them would be to go against God himself. This idea that no one can oppose the government because of its divinity is a point that Locke opposes drastically.

Locke views all men in the state as equal on all levels, with no man in a state of inequality. This differs from Aquinas and St. Augustine whom believe that the leader (even a tyrant) was one which god placed above all others. In the government created by Locke, the citizens have every right to revolt against an oppressive tyrant. Locke believes this because the government is a body that is composed of the desires of the majority. If the government or tyrant is not abiding by the majority's desires, then

...

...

Download as:   txt (7.7 Kb)   pdf (119.9 Kb)   docx (11.5 Kb)  
Continue for 5 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com
Citation Generator

(2010, 11). The Governments and States of Locke, Aquinas, and St. Augustine. ReviewEssays.com. Retrieved 11, 2010, from https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/The-Governments-and-States-of-Locke-Aquinas-and/6453.html

"The Governments and States of Locke, Aquinas, and St. Augustine" ReviewEssays.com. 11 2010. 2010. 11 2010 <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/The-Governments-and-States-of-Locke-Aquinas-and/6453.html>.

"The Governments and States of Locke, Aquinas, and St. Augustine." ReviewEssays.com. ReviewEssays.com, 11 2010. Web. 11 2010. <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/The-Governments-and-States-of-Locke-Aquinas-and/6453.html>.

"The Governments and States of Locke, Aquinas, and St. Augustine." ReviewEssays.com. 11, 2010. Accessed 11, 2010. https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/The-Governments-and-States-of-Locke-Aquinas-and/6453.html.