Should the Death Penalty Be Abolish?

Should The Death Penalty Be Abolish?

Putting to death people judged to have committed certain extremely terrible crimes is a practice of ancient standing, but in the United States in the second half of the twentieth century, it has become a very controversial issue. Changing views on this difficult issue led the Supreme Court to abolish capital punishment in 1972 but later upheld it in 1977. Although capital punishment is what the people want, there are many voices raised against it. People all over the country debate this issue quite frequently. They question the deterrent effect, morality, executions of innocents, and many more. I have heard a lot about the death penalty and feel that the arguments against it are not at all convincing. Capital Punishment is not a new concept. It is older then the Roman Empire, and has changed much since it's first use. Death through drowning, crucifixion, or hanging, or throwing form a high rock, or being thrown into a fiery furnace, or firing squad, or electric chair or the gas chamberÐ'--through the years these methods as well as others not mentioned have been what the world governments have used to instill fear in the populace, in order to maintain control. However in today's society, especially in the United States of America capital punishment has come to be something else. It is no longer a means of control; rather it has become a system of punishment in which the most heinous of criminals can be dealt with swiftly and justly. The death penalty should not be abolish, because of certain of cases, it is plainly evident that if capital punishment were abolished and the blood-curdling assaults were unpunishable by death, mob violence would be supreme. In some cases of crimes, when a violent act is committed, by a perpetrator, should be punish for that crime, by putting to death. Texas A&M University

collected data and the results are horrifying. In 1960 there were 56 executions and

9,140 murders. In 1964 there were 15 executions and 9,250 murders. In 1969 there were no executions and 14,590 murders. Seven more years without executions and there was 20,510 murders. As you can see the deterrent effect is there and works very well. If the death penalty were to be removed from our statue-book, the tendency to commit deeds of violence and prison population would increase

One reason why the death penalty should not be abolished is, Noone is safe in their homes, in the shopping center, in school, on their jobs, on the road with a flat tire or with car trouble, even in a court room; without being kidnap, killed, raped, shot by a fellow classmates, or murder by a convict in a court room. There have been so many violent crimes against innocent people: parents, children, grandparent, classmates, co-worker and judges were brilliantly murder for no reason at all. On April 20, 1999 in Littleton, Colorado at Columbine High School, twelve teenagers and one teacher were shot to death and eighteen others were wounded. The killers were Columbine High School students, who later were found dead from self-inflicted gunshot wounds; Roper v. Simmons, the Supreme Court's protecting even those convicted of heinous crimes. Christopher Simmons, at the age of 17, discussed with two companions his desire to murder someone saying they could "get away with it" because they were minors. He and a juvenile confederate broke into the house of Shirley Crook, covered her eyes and mouth, and bound her hands with duct tape. They drove her to a state park, walked her onto a bridge, tied her hands and feet together with electrical wire, completely

...