ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

League of Nations - a Success or a Failure?

Essay by   •  December 20, 2010  •  Research Paper  •  3,781 Words (16 Pages)  •  2,596 Views

Essay Preview: League of Nations - a Success or a Failure?

Report this essay
Page 1 of 16

After the First World War everyone wanted to avoid repetition of the mass slaughter of the war that had just ended. US was horrified by such an act, therefore, President Woodrow Wilson suggested an international body whose sole purpose was to maintain World peace. Before 1920 there was no such organization or place where the national Delegates could meet up and try to talk their way through their problems. After the War with great number of deaths, this idea was liked by almost everyone. Its main task was to sort out international disputes whenever they occurred. The League aimed to discourage aggression from any nation, to encourage countries to co-operate, especially in business and trade, to encourage nations to disarm, to improve the living and working conditions of people in all parts of the world.

The headquarters of the League was based in Geneva, Switzerland. There where no disputes here as this was and is a neutral country and did not take part in the WWI. This country already had an international organization running here, Red Cross. The Covenant laid out the structure and rules for each of the bodies within the organization. However, the very democratic organization of the League was a great problem. The top most element of the League was the Assembly. This was the League's Parliament. Every country in the League sent a representative to the assembly. This only met once a year and it needed the agreement of ALL member countries before taking a decision. It represented all members, states regardless of size, and they all had a vote each. The assembly did not really have power at all and most decisions were compromises. The council was a smaller group and met more often, usually five times a year and on emergencies. It included the permanent and the temporary members. It was conquered by the permanent members. These were the major powers: Britain, France, Japan and Italy in the 1920s. The temporary ones were elected by the assembly for a three year period. The permanent countries had a Veto. This means that they could say no to a decision even if all the others agreed and that would block the decision. On a Dispute or a problem, the council had three options/steps. First step: Verbal Sanctions, a warning was given to the offender to leave the invaded territory or else. Second step was to impose Economic sanctions on the country. This meant that all the member countries had to completely stop trade with the offending Nation and push it towards bankruptcy. But how was this possible when all the member countries were busy rebuilding the nations? This was one of the reasons why the US did not join the League. Third step was to impose Physical Sanctions Ð'- Military force was to be used against the offender but the League did not have an army. The League army was its member's army but often the members were not willing to risk their armies and navies for other countries. The court of Justice had no power like the assembly. They would just make judgements and hope they were obeyed. The secretariat was a sort of civil service. It kept records of the leagues meetings and prepared for reports for different agencies. This had sections providing humanitarian aid. The League took ages to take a decision but they did the best they could in their time. The technology was just not with them. They language was a major problem as well as there was no common language back then. The structural problems of the League stopped them from fulfilling their aims.

The League did a lot of activities in the 1920s. It had the support from most major countries. There were a couple of failures for the League in the 1920s. For example: Vilna. Many years before 1920, Vilna was under Russian control but long before that, it was the capital of Lithuania. Vilna now had only 2% Lithuanians and 30% Poles. Thus in 1920 the poles seized the city. Then the Lithuanians asked the League for help. But they were incapable of persuading them to leave the city. Vilna, then, stayed under Polish control till the outbreak of WWII. Therefore the poles won by force. However the League also had a number of successes in 1920. This included the dispute over the Aaland Islands. These islands were between Finland and Sweden. Traditionally they belonged to Finland but the population desired to be part of Sweden. But countries seemed to be confused and weren't able to decide as too who should own them. They asked the League for help. The League decided that the Fins should keep the island but they also made it a Demilitarized Zone. This decision was respected by both countries. However, the islanders were given autonomy Ð'- a kind of independence, they ruled themselves. The Fins had no control over them. Another area of dispute, that the League had success solving, was Upper Silesia in 1921. The inhabitants, under the treaty got the right to choose whether they wanted to be part of Germany or part of Poland. The majority choose Germany and this caused rioting and violence. The League was asked to settle the problem. The League decided to split Upper Silesia into two. This decision was accepted by both countries. Other than these two, there were three other successes. It solved the dispute in Memel and the war between Greece and Bulgaria. Although it failed to stop the bloody war in Turkey, it still provided humanitarian aid there. Despite these successes, something happened in the 1920s which showed that the League was not very successful when it came to dealing with major powers. The borders between Italy and Albania were a constant source of irritation for the two countries, as it had not been drawn properly in the treaty of Versailles. In 1923, a mixed nationality survey team was sent out to settle the issue. Whilst travelling to the disputed area, the Italian section of the survey team became separated from the main party. The Italians were shot by a group of gunmen. Italy accused Greece of planning this whole incident and demanded a large fine. But Greece refused to pay. In response, the Italians sent its navy to the Greek island of Corfu and bombarded the coastline. Greece appealed to the League for help. The League condemned Mussolini's (who was leading Italy) actions. It also suggested that Greece pays the compensation. Officially Mussolini accepted the decision but behind its back it persuaded Conference of Ambassadors to change the League decision. So instead Greece had to apologize and pay the compensation.

Overall, the League was a success in the 1920s with about five successes in settling dispute between the minor countries. Yet they also had two failures. However, contributing to their successes the League had its humanitarian work. They provided humanitarian aid all across the world. However, these successes were easily forgotten over its failure at the political level. Many of the groups now working for

...

...

Download as:   txt (21.6 Kb)   pdf (216.7 Kb)   docx (16.7 Kb)  
Continue for 15 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com
Citation Generator

(2010, 12). League of Nations - a Success or a Failure?. ReviewEssays.com. Retrieved 12, 2010, from https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/League-of-Nations-a-Success-or-a/24215.html

"League of Nations - a Success or a Failure?" ReviewEssays.com. 12 2010. 2010. 12 2010 <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/League-of-Nations-a-Success-or-a/24215.html>.

"League of Nations - a Success or a Failure?." ReviewEssays.com. ReviewEssays.com, 12 2010. Web. 12 2010. <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/League-of-Nations-a-Success-or-a/24215.html>.

"League of Nations - a Success or a Failure?." ReviewEssays.com. 12, 2010. Accessed 12, 2010. https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/League-of-Nations-a-Success-or-a/24215.html.