ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

Islam: A Short History

Essay by   •  December 6, 2010  •  Essay  •  2,867 Words (12 Pages)  •  1,878 Views

Essay Preview: Islam: A Short History

Report this essay
Page 1 of 12

Karen Armstrong, billed on the jacket as "one of the world's foremost scholars on religious affairs," comments on everything from the Christian Crusades, the formation of the state of Israel in 1948, the taking of hostages by Ayatollah Khomeini and his issuance of a fatwah on author Salman Rushdie, and Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam to the Taliban in her book Islam: A Short History. It is important to note that the book was published prior to the destruction that occurred in the United States on September 11, 2001. Armstrong's observations, though often flawed because of her rose-colored view of Islam's mysticism, accurately reveal the impending nightmare of the Taliban. She harshly condemns the Taliban as fundamentalist and contrary to the Qur'an.

While I wholeheartedly agree with Armstrong's condemnation of the Taliban and its ideology and actions, I still must take issue with a number of critical observations and statements that she makes throughout her book. Her premise is that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance, despite the fact that the West has incorrectly, and contrary to fact in her opinion, stereotyped it as a religion that provokes and promotes violence and intolerance.

A Community of Muslims. Armstrong writes, "The Qur'an did not put forward any philosophical arguments for monotheism; its approach was practical, and as such, appealed to the pragmatic Arabs. The old religion, the Qur'an claimed, was simply not working. There was spiritual malaiseÐ'....The way forward lay in a single God and unified unmah (Muslim community), which was governed by justice and equity" (8). Armstrong repeats this Qur'anic ideal throughout her book. She explains that to follow the Qur'an is to work to establish a politically and socially Muslim community that adheres to and upholds Qur'anic principles. She critiques the Taliban's fundamentalist attempt at establishing this community as hopelessly evil and unislamic, even though the principles they so aggressively and terribly carry out into action (i.e., the subjugation of Islamic women and mutilation and stoning as forms of punishment) come directly from the Qur'an. Her problem lies in her premise. Armstrong's premise is that Islam is a peaceful and tolerant religion, and the violence and intolerance that is so often associated with it is unislamic and fundamentalist. It is with this premise that I take issue.

Is This Allah? According to Armstrong, the Qur'an advocates the one transcendent God as opposed to paganism, "much like Taoism, Confucianism, Hinduism, Buddhism, monotheism in the Middle East, and rationalism in Europe...[these faiths] focused on a single deity or supreme symbol of transcendence" (7). Armstrong astonishingly concludes: "Constantly the Qur'an points out that Muhammad had not come to cancel the older religions, to contradict their prophets or to start a new faith. His message is the same as that of Abraham, Moses, David, Solomon, or Jesus" (8)! It is true that the Qur'an mentions these names; however, the proclamations it makes about each of them are not the same as, and cannot be reconciled with, the proclamations found in Scripture.

As a mystic, Armstrong's conceptual understanding of the transcendent is also flawed. She simply understands that it is One. Moreover, in her view God is so totally different from humans that this former nun can accept the Qur'an's denials of the Trinity and the incarnation of the Son of God as human to die for us. According to Armstrong, love is above all else, including conceptual truth. She, therefore, lauds the Muslim Sufis as she perceives them rising above the religious wars because they rejected conceptual truth. She also praises monasticism and mystical spirituality (74Ð'-75; 90Ð'-93, 122; cf. my review of Karen Armstrong's A History of God, Christian Research Journal, 18, no. 4 [1996]: 52).

The Qur'an: A Divine Revelation? Armstrong alleges that Jews and Christians sometimes taunted the Arabs for having no prophet and no Scripture (3). In answer to this taunt, in the year 610, "the prophet Muhammad (570Ð'-632) receives his first revelation of the Qur'an in Mecca and two years later begins to preach" (xiii). The first "revelation" of Muhammad to which Armstrong refers is recorded to have occurred on the 17th night of the month of Ramadan when Muhammad "woke to find himself overpowered by a devastating presence which squeezed him tightly until he heard the first words of a new Arab's scripture pouring from his lips" (4). Muhammad spoke of the pain involved in receiving the revelations. As Armstrong puts it: "His whole body was torn away from him. The impact was so frightening that his whole body convulsed; he would often sweat profusely even on a cool day,

experience great heaviness, or hear strange sounds or voices" (5).

Today, persons who allegedly receive "revelations" like this might be called channelers, mediums, or spiritualists. Those familiar with Mormonism will note remarkable similarities between the stories of the revelations of its founder, Joseph Smith, and those of Islam's Muhammad. In the same way as Muhammad desired to present a special revelation to his people, Smith lamented the lack of God's revelation to Americans. It is also recorded that God enabled Smith, a young man who had not studied any languages, to translate gold plates and produce a revelation. Would Armstrong uncritically refer to the Book of Mormon as divine "revelation" in the same way she does the Qur'an?

The one true God, the God of the Bible, provides His people with tests to distinguish true prophets from false prophets: first, their teaching must be consistent with previous Scripture (Deut. 13:1Ð'-3); second, their signs must come to pass (Deut. 18: 21Ð'-22); and third, Jesus tells us, "by their fruit you will recognize them" (Matt. 7:16). Muhammad explicitly contradicted the biblical teaching that Jesus is the Son of God and regarded basic Christian belief as idolatrous blasphemy. Muhammad also performed no miracles, which could be tested. Finally, what sort of fruit did Muhammad bring forth? Was violence one of his fruits?

Islam's Violence as a "Myth." Armstrong's history claims, "Ever since the Crusades, the people of western Christendom developed a stereotypical and distorted image of IslamÐ'... Islam was described by the learned scholar-monks of Europe as an inherently violent and intolerant faith, which had only been able to establish itself by the sword. The myth of the supposed fanatical intolerance of Islam has become one of the received ideas of the West"

...

...

Download as:   txt (17.5 Kb)   pdf (183.8 Kb)   docx (16.4 Kb)  
Continue for 11 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com
Citation Generator

(2010, 12). Islam: A Short History. ReviewEssays.com. Retrieved 12, 2010, from https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Islam-A-Short-History/19227.html

"Islam: A Short History" ReviewEssays.com. 12 2010. 2010. 12 2010 <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Islam-A-Short-History/19227.html>.

"Islam: A Short History." ReviewEssays.com. ReviewEssays.com, 12 2010. Web. 12 2010. <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Islam-A-Short-History/19227.html>.

"Islam: A Short History." ReviewEssays.com. 12, 2010. Accessed 12, 2010. https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Islam-A-Short-History/19227.html.