ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

Fabricating an Enemy and the Truth

Essay by   •  April 26, 2011  •  Research Paper  •  2,258 Words (10 Pages)  •  1,023 Views

Essay Preview: Fabricating an Enemy and the Truth

Report this essay
Page 1 of 10

Fabricating an Enemy and the truth

When it comes to fabricating the truth, the Pentagon and the United Kingdom have been doing it for decades. Looking as far back as WWII the United Kingdom's Foreign Office created the IRD (Information Research Department) which took over from wartime and slightly post-war departments such as the Ministry of Information and dispensed propaganda via various media such as the BBC and publishing. The IRD was founded in 1948, as a department of the British Foreign Office set up to counter Russian propaganda and infiltration, particularly amongst the western labour movement.

The department was closed down in 1977 minister.

We can also look at the War in Afghanistan. Where in 2001 the invasion of Afghanistan, psychological operations tactics were employed to demoralize the Taliban and to win the sympathies of the Afghan population. At least six EC-130E Commando Solo aircraft were used to jam local radio transmissions and transmit replacement propaganda messages. Leaflets were also dropped throughout Afghanistan, offering rewards for Osama bin Laden and other individuals, portraying Americans as friends of Afghanistan and emphasizing various negative aspects of the Taliban. This technique proved to be very effective and is still in use today in Iraq.

In Iraq Military planners in the Pentagon are acutely aware of the central role of war propaganda. Waged from the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA, a fear and disinformation campaign (FDC) has been launched. The blatant distortion of the truth and the systematic manipulation of all sources of information is an integral part of war planning. In the wake of 9/11, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld created to the Office of Strategic Influence (OSI), or "Office of Disinformation" as it was labeled by its critics:

"The Department of Defense said they needed to do this, and they were going to actually plant stories that were false in foreign countries -- as an effort to influence public opinion across the world.1

And, all of a sudden, the OSI was formally disbanded following political pressures and "troublesome" media stories that "its purpose was to deliberately lie to advance American interests."2 "Rumsfeld backed off and said this is embarrassing."3 Yet despite this apparent about-turn, the Pentagon’s Orwellian disinformation campaign remains functionally intact: "The secretary of defense is not being particularly candid here. Disinformation in military propaganda is part of war."4

Rumsfeld later confirmed in a press interview that while the OSI no longer exists in name, the "Office’s intended functions are being carried out" 5 (Rumsfeld’s precise words can be consulted at http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2002/11/dod111802.html ).

A number of government agencies and intelligence units --with links to the Pentagon-- are involved in various components of the propaganda campaign. Realities are turned upside down. Acts of war are heralded as "humanitarian interventions" geared towards "regime change" and "the restoration of democracy". Military occupation and the killing of civilians are presented as "peace-keeping". The derogation of civil liberties --in the context of the so-called "anti-terrorist legislation"-- is portrayed as a means to providing "domestic security" and upholding civil liberties. And underlying these manipulated realties, "Osama bin Laden" and "Weapons of Mass Destruction" statements, which circulate profusely in the news chain, are upheld as the basis for an understanding of World events.

In the critical "planning stages" leading up to an invasion of Iraq, the twisting of public opinion at home and around the World, is an integral part of the War agenda, War propaganda is pursued at all stages: before, during the military operation as well as in its cruel aftermath. War propaganda serves to drown the real causes and consequences of war.

A few months after the OSI was disbanded amidst controversy (February 2002), The New York Times confirmed that the disinformation campaign was running strong and that the Pentagon was:

"…considering issuing a secret directive to American military to conduct covert operations aimed at influencing public opinion and policymakers in friendly and neutral nations …The proposal has ignited a fierce battle throughout the Bush administration over whether the military should carry out secret propaganda missions in friendly nations like Germany… The fight, one Pentagon official said, is over �the strategic communications for our nation, the message we want to send for long-term influence, and how we do it….’We have the assets and the capabilities and the training to go into friendly and neutral nations to influence public opinion. We could do it and get away with it. That doesn't mean we should.’6

Fabricating the Truth

To sustain the war agenda, these "fabricated realities", funneled on a day to day basis into the news chain must become indelible truths, which form part of a broad political and media consensus. In this regard, the corporate media вЂ"although acting independently of the military-intelligence apparatus, is an instrument of this evolving totalitarian system.

In close liaison with the Pentagon and the CIA, the State Department has also set up its own "soft-sell" (civilian) propaganda unit, headed by Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Charlotte Beers, a powerful figure in the advertising industry. Working in liaison with the Pentagon, Beers was appointed to head the State Department’s propaganda unit in the immediate wake of 9/11. Her mandate is "to counteract anti-Americanism abroad."7 Her office at the State department is to:

"ensure that public diplomacy (engaging, informing, and influencing key international audiences) is practiced in harmony with public affairs (outreach to Americans) and traditional diplomacy to advance U.S. interests and security and to provide the moral basis for U.S. leadership in the world." (http://www.state.gov/r/ )

* Iraq

The most powerful component of the Fear and Disinformation Campaign (FDI) rests with the CIA, which, secretly subsidizes

...

...

Download as:   txt (14.2 Kb)   pdf (165 Kb)   docx (15.5 Kb)  
Continue for 9 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com
Citation Generator

(2011, 04). Fabricating an Enemy and the Truth. ReviewEssays.com. Retrieved 04, 2011, from https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Fabricating-an-Enemy-and-the-Truth/52110.html

"Fabricating an Enemy and the Truth" ReviewEssays.com. 04 2011. 2011. 04 2011 <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Fabricating-an-Enemy-and-the-Truth/52110.html>.

"Fabricating an Enemy and the Truth." ReviewEssays.com. ReviewEssays.com, 04 2011. Web. 04 2011. <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Fabricating-an-Enemy-and-the-Truth/52110.html>.

"Fabricating an Enemy and the Truth." ReviewEssays.com. 04, 2011. Accessed 04, 2011. https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Fabricating-an-Enemy-and-the-Truth/52110.html.