ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

Demand for Veal Versus Veal Calves Welfare

Essay by   •  February 21, 2011  •  Research Paper  •  2,464 Words (10 Pages)  •  1,517 Views

Essay Preview: Demand for Veal Versus Veal Calves Welfare

Report this essay
Page 1 of 10

Demand for Veal versus Veal Calves Welfare

952795

Meat demand is rapidly rising around the world; this can be contributed to the economic growth in third world countries. As the third world countries standard of living and buying power increases, so does the demand for the expensive protein, meat. As meat becomes less and less a sign of status and power, the worldwide demand for meat will increase, and this will lead to a need to increase the production of meat in the countries which produce the product . As societies evolve, we must be sure that the animals welfare does not get left behind. As Cathy Liss (2007) says,"we need to promote and insist on a complete overhaul in the way farm animals are kept that brings them back to being animals not meat- or milk-producing machines or objects." Today one can use the booming veal industry to examine and help prevent problems that may arise in the not-so- distant future.

Understanding what veal is, how it is raised, and who is buying it can help consumers better understand what is necessary and what can be changed within the industry. Veal is defined by Webster's dictionary (2006) as the flesh of a young calf. This calf is usually a bull calf born to a dairy cow although there are exceptions to this rule. Veal as we know it today had its origins in Europe. According to the Veal Quality Assurance Program & Veal Issues Management (2007), prior to the mid-60s, veal was produced solely in Europe with many U.S. dairy farmers selling skim milk - a natural by-product of butter and cheese processing - to veal producers in the Netherlands. Dutch veal producers found that feeding veal calves a diet of skim milk, whey and fat led to increased weights and improved meat quality. Only after this discovery, did the veal industry make its debut in the United States.

When the industry crossed the ocean to the United States, it brought along with it a conventional way to raise the veal calves, crates. These crates are located in barns and confine the calf for 24 hours a day with little or no room to do normal body movements such as turning around. Many times the calves cannot even stretch out their legs when lying down. The calves that are confined to these crates are placed into two categories, white veal and red veal. According to the Veal Quality Assurance Program and Veal Issues Management (2007), white veal is fed a milk-based diet, thus these special-fed calves remain pre-ruminant. The red veal results because once a calf is fed grain; the meat develops the strong flavor that is commonly associated with beef. This is thanks to the rumination process in which the fermentation in the rumen causes the change in texture and flavor of the veal. There is one more class of veal that escapes the crates, bob veal. Bob veal is slaughtered soon after birth, and thus they are never placed in crates, but these calves are a small portion of the market (PETA, 2007).

Each country that produces veal has its own rules and regulations to keep the industry safe and healthy for both the calves and the consumers. The ocean gulf between the two main veal producers also demonstrates another gulf, the one between the laws for raising veal. In the past year the European countries have passed a law that forbids the use of veal crates in the veal industry. The EU recently modified the treaty of Amsterdam to include a better definition of animal rights and it reads as follows,

...desiring to ensure improved protection and respect for welfare of animals as sentient beings; in formulating and implementing the Community's agriculture, transport, internal market, and research policies, the Community and Member States shall pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals, while respecting religious rites, cultural tradition, and regional heritage (Moynagh, 2007 ).

Several reports have been adopted on the welfare of animals in intensive production systems, which include veal calves. In the past, young calves, usually from a dairy herd, were fattened up for slaughter by housing them individually in small pens and feeding them a pure milk diet. This type of livestock system produces calves that yield veal meat products.

Following a report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare, calf systems involving small individual cages and milk diets low in iron were prohibited in Europe. This way of raising animals is possible because European consumers are aware and very sensitive to animal welfare and are prepared to pay higher prices for animals that are raised humanely.

Europe has been engaged in discussions on animal welfare and relevant legislation for a considerable period of time. Concern for animal welfare and a desire for improvement is a consumer driven issue and it will not go away. The legislation that has been enacted in Europe is science-based. The Member States of the European Union are very sensitive to the trade issues resulting from animal welfare considerations and have initiated reviews of existing legislation based on the outcome of recent World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations (Moynagh 2007).

While the European Union has made large steps forward to meet the desires of consumers, the United States has basically stalled. The United States still uses veal crates and formula low in iron. Public concerns, animal activists, and pending legislation have prompted several studies investigating veal calf welfare. Concerns include tethering practices, housing conditions, liquid diets and social deprivation of individually stalled calves.

The federal U.S. bill entitled Veal Calf Protection Act demonstrates the vast gulf between the European nations and the United States. When the bill was introduced in 1989 and then reintroduced in 1990, it was rejected due to lack of congressional support, but it did open the eyes of the public with its content. The second version of the bill stated that:

"The confining of calves in crates and tethering is unnecessary and may impair calf health; milk replacer diets retard rumen development; and antibiotic residues may pose a human health risk. The proposed bill prohibited veal calf production unless the enclosure or tethers did not restrict the ability of the calf to turn around, lie with its legs outstretched, and groom itself. Diets must contain sufficient iron and fiber to maintain full health and the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture would establish standards for the feeding of veal calves"(Wilson, 2000).

Similar bills were recently re-introduced and ratified in Arizona and Florida, with other states having a similar bill in the works. Many states are moving in

...

...

Download as:   txt (14.7 Kb)   pdf (166.2 Kb)   docx (14.9 Kb)  
Continue for 9 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com