ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

California Vs Peterson

Essay by   •  December 24, 2010  •  Essay  •  983 Words (4 Pages)  •  1,223 Views

Essay Preview: California Vs Peterson

Report this essay
Page 1 of 4

Laci Peterson, a 27-year-old wife who was eight months pregnant, disappeared on December 24, 2002. When the body of the California woman and her unborn child were found four months later, her husband, Scott, was charged with two counts of murder. Detective Craig Grogan gave a sworn statement that he had probable cause to believe Mr. Peterson committed two counts of the crime of 187 Penal Code, homicide, on or about December 23, 2002 or December 24,2002, in the county of Stanislaus. April 17, 2003 at 0658 hours the Judge of the Superior Court in Stanislaus County, California issued a warrant for the arrest of Scott Lee Peterson. The court found that the District Attorney's office did, in fact, have probable cause to bring Scott Peterson in. The Judge specifically addressed bail in the warrant. No bail was granted. April 18, 2003 at 1110 hours, Scott Peterson was arrested at the Torrey Pines Golf Course, in Sand Diego County, California. At the time of his arrest, Peterson had colored his hair blonde, grown a beard and mustache, and was carrying $15,000.00 in cash. During his arrest police also discovered that Peterson's car was full of camping and survival equipment. Peterson was arrested less than 20 minutes from the Mexican border. Peterson waived booking in San Mateo County, California, and was transferred back to Stanislaus County, California, where he was formally booked by the Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department.

Scott Peterson had his preliminary hearing on April 17, 2003. Superior Court Judge Al Girolami ordered Scott Peterson to stand trial on two counts of murder. Peterson's arraignment quickly followed. Peterson was arraigned on April 21, 2003. The Prosecution charged him with the following: Count I: On or about and between December 23, 2002 and December 24, 2002, the defendant did commit a felony, Murder, violation of Section 187 of the California Penal Code; the defendant did willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously and with malice aforethought murder Laci Denise Peterson, a human being. Special Allegation charges were made in conjunction with the felony murder charge of Laci Denise Peterson. It is further alleged as to Count 1, MURDER that the defendant acted intentionally, deliberately and with premeditation. Enhancement: TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY. During the commission of the murder of Laci Denise Peterson, the defendant, with the knowledge that Laci Denise Peterson was pregnant, did inflict injury on Laci Denise Peterson resulting in the termination of her pregnancy, a violation of Section 12022.9 (a) of the California Penal Code. Count II: On or about and between December 23, 2002 and December 24, 2002, defendant did commit a felony, MURDER, violation of Section 187 of the California Penal Code; in that the defendant did willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously and with malice aforethought murder Baby Conner Peterson, a fetus. It is further alleged as to Count II, MURDER,

...

...

Download as:   txt (5 Kb)   pdf (78.8 Kb)   docx (10.3 Kb)  
Continue for 3 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com
Citation Generator

(2010, 12). California Vs Peterson. ReviewEssays.com. Retrieved 12, 2010, from https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/California-Vs-Peterson/26456.html

"California Vs Peterson" ReviewEssays.com. 12 2010. 2010. 12 2010 <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/California-Vs-Peterson/26456.html>.

"California Vs Peterson." ReviewEssays.com. ReviewEssays.com, 12 2010. Web. 12 2010. <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/California-Vs-Peterson/26456.html>.

"California Vs Peterson." ReviewEssays.com. 12, 2010. Accessed 12, 2010. https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/California-Vs-Peterson/26456.html.