ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

Arthur Ashe and Robert Finn

Essay by   •  November 27, 2010  •  Research Paper  •  1,979 Words (8 Pages)  •  1,640 Views

Essay Preview: Arthur Ashe and Robert Finn

Report this essay
Page 1 of 8

In 1992 Arthur Ashe, the first black man to win the U.S. Open, announced at a press conference that he was HIV positive. He had been previously tipped that U.S.A today had been informed of the situation, and was going to print the story, and beat them to the chase. Later on that year Arthur Ashe spoke vividly about the situation and revealed the press, that he felt forced into clarifying his situation after the media was tipped about his HIV status.

Arthur Ashe also stated in a later interview with U.S.A today, that the Highly ranked newspaper had not been the first to know about his HIV status. Other media professional backed this statement, after Arthur Ashe's death in 1993. Broadcasters later went on record with A&E Biography, to say that it was universally agreed upon to keep the matter private and not to publish the story, for fear of African American community being devastated

and Ashe's repertoire of history making event's to be scrutinized. Ashe had been diagnosed since 1988.

Wether or not the freedom of speech and press was involved, they all decided it was morally wrong to publish the story. Richard Finn, the person who was originally supposed to break the story had it not been for Ashe's interference, Later went on record and said he regretted the decision, and his own personal moral theory had been put aside for financial gain and credibility.

In the textbook, the definition of a personal moral theory is or own formal recognition of the structure through which we engage in moral reasoning and by which we make the more significant moral decisions of our lives, particularly in professional decisions (pg.43).

Richard Finn had obviously made an immoral decision as he admitted to later in life. His ultimate goal was morally corrupt, since his motivation was not focused on the impact or consequences of his actions, it could not be morally correct. He did not think about his personal values, He was focused on personal gain.

Richard Finn according to the text, was not morally mature enough to handle the situation. He failed to abide even the childlike stages of Kohlberg's six stages of moral maturity. Kohlberg's six stages of moral maturity are: avoiding punishment, expecting reward, confirming to group expectation, following rules, becoming an autonomous moral agent, valuing human beings (pg.52).

Finn failed to confirm to Kohlberg stages, He ignored all punishment for personal gain. He avoided public persecution, because Ashe decided to inform the public himself. Had it not been for Ashe, Finn's professional rep would have been non existent. It was agreed upon among the media broadcasters and journalists not to break the story for a while, Ashe had been diagnosed since 1988. He did not think of the people he would effect, and the kind of effect the story would have.

The list of virtues would have helped Finn discover his immoral reasons for writing the story. Had he asked himself questions like Ð''how much do I value information being available to others?', Ð'' Is this story important enough to break out group conformity and be an individual?' Ð'' do I feel that this information should be protected because it reveal someone's personal health status, and it would do more harm than good?'.

Because of Finn's poor morals, he was not respected professionally. Finn was interviewed by A&E biography by saying he felt like he was "blackballed" out of U.S.A today, and has since left the company and is now reduced to freelance writing.

Chapter 2 teaches us not to censor ourselves, but how to morally evaluate situations. It teaches us how to make moral decisions in the media but not limit ourselves and deprive the audience of important information. It teaches how to become morally mature and gives a list of virtues to help question ourselves before making decisions in the media.

In 1992 Arthur Ashe, the first black man to win the U.S. Open, announced at a press conference that he was HIV positive. He had been previously tipped that U.S.A today had been informed of the situation, and was going to print the story, and beat them to the chase. Later on that year Arthur Ashe spoke vividly about the situation and revealed the press, that he felt forced into clarifying his situation after the media was tipped about his HIV status.

Arthur Ashe also stated in a later interview with U.S.A today, that the Highly ranked newspaper had not been the first to know about his HIV status. Other media professional backed this statement, after Arthur Ashe's death in 1993. Broadcasters later went on record with A&E Biography, to say that it was universally agreed upon to keep the matter private and not to publish the story, for fear of African American community being devastated

and Ashe's repertoire of history making event's to be scrutinized. Ashe had been diagnosed since 1988.

Wether or not the freedom of speech and press was involved, they all decided it was morally wrong to publish the story. Richard Finn, the person who was originally supposed to break the story had it not been for Ashe's interference, Later went on record and said he regretted the decision, and his own personal moral theory had been put aside for financial gain and credibility.

In the textbook, the definition of a personal moral theory is or own formal recognition of the structure through which we engage in moral reasoning and by which we make the more significant moral decisions of our lives, particularly in professional decisions (pg.43).

Richard Finn had obviously made an immoral decision as he admitted to later in life. His ultimate goal was morally corrupt, since his motivation was not focused on the impact or consequences of his actions, it could not be morally correct. He did not think about his personal values, He was focused on personal gain.

Richard Finn according to the text, was not morally mature enough to handle the situation. He failed to abide even the childlike stages of Kohlberg's six stages of moral maturity. Kohlberg's six stages of moral maturity are: avoiding punishment, expecting reward, confirming to group expectation, following rules, becoming an autonomous moral agent, valuing human beings (pg.52).

Finn failed to confirm to Kohlberg stages, He ignored all punishment for personal gain. He avoided public persecution, because Ashe decided to inform the public himself. Had it not been for Ashe, Finn's professional rep would have been non existent. It was agreed upon among the media broadcasters and journalists not to break the story for a while, Ashe had been diagnosed since 1988. He did not think of the people he would effect,

...

...

Download as:   txt (11.6 Kb)   pdf (136.4 Kb)   docx (10.6 Kb)  
Continue for 7 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com
Citation Generator

(2010, 11). Arthur Ashe and Robert Finn. ReviewEssays.com. Retrieved 11, 2010, from https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Arthur-Ashe-and-Robert-Finn/15815.html

"Arthur Ashe and Robert Finn" ReviewEssays.com. 11 2010. 2010. 11 2010 <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Arthur-Ashe-and-Robert-Finn/15815.html>.

"Arthur Ashe and Robert Finn." ReviewEssays.com. ReviewEssays.com, 11 2010. Web. 11 2010. <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Arthur-Ashe-and-Robert-Finn/15815.html>.

"Arthur Ashe and Robert Finn." ReviewEssays.com. 11, 2010. Accessed 11, 2010. https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/Arthur-Ashe-and-Robert-Finn/15815.html.