Ruth BenedictThis print version free essay Ruth Benedict.
Autor: reviewessays 08 November 2010
Words: 1124 | Pages: 5
Ruth Benedictâ€™s anthropological book, Patterns of Culture explores the dualism of culture and personality. Benedict studies different cultures such as the Zuni tribe and the Dobu Indians. Each culture she finds is so different and distinctive in relation to the norm of our society. Each difference is what makes it unique. Benedict compares the likenesses of culture and individuality, â€œA culture, like an individual, is a more or less consistent pattern of thought or actionâ€ (46), but note, they are not the same by use of the word, â€œlike.â€ Benedict is saying that figuratively, cultures are like personalities. Culture and individuality are intertwined and dependent upon each other for survival.
The Zuniâ€™s, according to Benedict, are a culture that is very consumed with ceremony and ritual. The Zuniâ€™s value the absence of excess, moderation, ceremony and tradition, â€œHe keeps the middle of the road, stays within the known map, does not meddle with disruptive psychological statesâ€¦even in the exaltation of the dance he â€˜remains what he is, and retains his civic nameâ€ (79). This quote symbolizes the extreme devotion and belief infested in the Zuni culture. A strong sense of restraint and composure is found in the end of the quote, â€œeven in the exaltation of the dance he remains what he is.â€
The Zuniâ€™s prize the unity of the community as a functioning whole. It is necessary in this culture to adapt to the norm of the community in order to be a successful member of society. The Zuniâ€™s are considered to be an Appolonian society. They are group centered, a humble, modest and ritualistic society. In a culture such as the Zuniâ€™s the individual voice can have a tendency to not be heard.
Unlike the Zuni, the Dobu value excess, imbalance, and immoderation. The Dobu are self-sufficient and self-reliant. They live in a hostile environment and wear fake smiles and only care about their own personal gain. Dobuâ€™s will kill, cheat, and steal to get the things they want, â€œBehind a show of friendship, behind the evidences of co-operation, in every field of life, the Dobuan believes that he has only treachery to expectâ€ (171). The most treacherous, deceitful, and dishonest people are the leaders in this society.
In the very different Zuni and Dobu tribes there is a common theme. The Zuni culture concentrates on the well being of community as a whole. This idea seems to exclude the impact an individual may have on society. The Dobuan society is more self-concerned. When an entire people only care about himself or herself, what becomes of the whole?
Perhaps what Benedict is trying to assert is that culture and personality are not the same, nor are they different. A personality is shaped by the culture in which it is born into. A culture is shaped by the repeated ceremonies, traditions, beliefs, and ideals performed by the individuals in the community over time:
No individual can arrive at the threshold of his potentialities without a culture in which he participates. Conversely, no civilization has in it any element that the last analysis is not the contribution of an individual. Where else could any trait come from except from the behaviour of a man or a woman or a child? (253)
What Benedict is saying here is that an individual can never discover the depths of himself or herself without the scrutiny of a culture as a guideline. For if he has no culture, he has no way of measurement! Likewise, culture cannot exist if it does not reap from the actions and behavior of human beings. In other words, individual personality and culture cannot exist solely without another.
Culture and personality work together in unison in a process of giving-and-taking. According to Benedict, it is not important to stress what sets culture and individual apart. It is important to concentrate on what it is that brings them together, â€œIt is always a give-and-take. The problem of the individual is not clarified by stressing the antagonism between culture and the individual, but by stressing their mutual reinforcementâ€ (253).
It is the differences between culture and individuality that allow for a healthy friction to occur. In the process of give-and-take, culture is fed into the individual at a very early age and as the child grows he is able to have feedback into culture (either by adapting or rebelling).
When Benedict says that cultures are like personalities she means this figuratively. Benedict seems to blend individuality and culture in â€œThe Individual and Culture.â€ Perhaps what Benedict means is that individuality and culture work so closely that they can be confused as the same. â€œHis culture provides the raw material of which the individual makes his life. If it is meagre, the individual suffers; if it is rich, the individual has a chance to rise to his opportunityâ€ (252).
Benedict clarifies perfectly in this statement. Culture acts as the starting point for an individual. If an individual is blessed with the riches of a particular culture, then they are that much better off. However, if a person is not blessed with the riches of their culture, they are at a disadvantage and must work harder to obtain them.
Culture and personality work as a function of one another. They are separate but still very much alike. In order to function properly the elements do not have to be identical; instead, they must use their differences to their advantage:
â€¦ The cultures of Zuni, Dobu.â€¦differ from one another not only because one trait is present here and absent thereâ€¦They differ still more because they are oriented as wholes in different directions. They are traveling along different roads in pursuit of different endsâ€¦(223).
Each society finds the right amount of individuality and culture that works for them. In the Zuni society, a focus on community was more prevalent. In the Dobu society, the emphasis was more self-centered. Each culture is focused on a different end; therefore their method for going about it is different in each setting.
Benedict believes that cultures are like personalities in the sense that both can individually be shaped, created, and changed. An individual takes on the values of a culture, uniting them but not joining them. To say personality is culture would take away from the distinctive character of the individual. Benedict is saying that the distinctive character exists in the culture in which they are born into. The culture does not create the personality. Instead, culture acts as the building block for the individual.