ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moore's Utopia and Machiavelli's the Prince

Essay by   •  November 23, 2010  •  Essay  •  1,536 Words (7 Pages)  •  3,153 Views

Essay Preview: A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moore's Utopia and Machiavelli's the Prince

Report this essay
Page 1 of 7

Just vs. Viable

To be just is to be fair and honorable. Kids are taught that if you are kind and just you will excel and be successful. But life's not fair and being just doesn't necessary mean that a society will stand the test of time and be able to grow. The two different societies introduced in More's Utopia and Machiavelli's The Prince are very different and although More's Utopian society would be considered more just then Machiavelli's society. Machiavelli's society is more realistic and more likely to be viable.

Leadership is a major issue when it comes to whether or not a society is going to be viable. It seems that if the leader is a good leader, a leader that puts his people first and wants the best for his country, then the land and the society should flourish. But if the leader is a bad leader, a power driven leader, a leader who puts himself first, and lets his people starve while he and his nobles live in excess, then the society and land will not flourish. This idea is not demonstrated to us in Utopia or The Prince; it seems like the exact opposite.

Utopia has a more democratic government. Each set of households elects someone and then those elects elect others, and although there is a prince they still have the power to throw him out of office if he's involved in any wrong doing. And although their prince doesn't have as much power as a prince in Machiavelli's writing the prince in Utopia serves a different purpose. The prince in Utopia is there to provide stability. With the syphogrants and tranibors changing annually the stability of a constant figure head is needed. More describes the government as follows

"Once a year, every group of thirty households elects an official,

Formerly called the syphogrant, but now called the phylarch. Over

Every group of ten syphogrants with their households there is another official, once called the tranibor but now known as the head phylarch. All the syphogrants, two hundred in number, are brought together to elect the prince. They take an oath to choose the man they think best qualified; and then by secret ballot they elect they prince from among four men nominated by the people of the four sections of the city. The prince holds office for life, unless he is suspected of aiming at a tyranny. Though the tranibors are elected annually they are not changed for light or casual reasons. All other officials hold office for a single year only. "

Any one can be a syphogrant or tranibor. And once you have a chance to be one you can not be re-elected. This prevents the same people from always being in office. And although you can campaign for office it is looked down upon. They believe the if you want the office that much you must have ulterior motives fueling you, so you wont be elected. They also had a rules whose purpose was to "prevent the prince and the tranibors from conspiring together to alter the government and enslave the people. "

Although the Utopians are free, they don't exercise their freedom and they have slaves. The slaves are people captured from other nations that don't have Utopian ideals and Utopians that have committed a crime. More also says that

"Slaves, moreover, are permanent and visible reminder that crime does

not pay. If the slaves rebel against their condition, then, like savage beast

which neither bars nor chains can tame, they put instantly to death. But if

they are patient, they are not left altogether without hope. When subdued

by long hardships, if they show by their behavior that they regret the crime

more than the punishment, their slavery is lightened or remitted

altogether, sometimes by the prince's pardon, sometimes by popular

vote. "

Also all the Utopians think the same. This is the main reason why their society wouldn't be viable although it is more just. The fact that they don't value money and no one pays for anything, everyone just takes what they need, makes the Utopian society more just because everything seems fair. But it's unrealistic, it's not human nature. The Utopians as a society are very self centered, so it's hard to believe that they would be such honest people. And the fact that they don't fight their own wars and they don't abide by any rules of war, they win by any means even if it means "fighting dirty." The Utopians put on a front of having these great morals and being a great society, but its all smoke and mirrors. They make themselves look like a wonderful society. But they are the lesser of two evils, they are more just then the society in The Prince, although they aren't as viable.

The government in The Prince is a monarchy, with a distinctive cast system. Machiavelli said that the best way to keep order in this kind of society was for the people to fear their leader but not to hate him because "the prince must have the people well disposed toward him; otherwise in times of adversity there is no hope. " The prince had to keep the people, the nobles and the army all happy at the same time. The people were kept happy to keep them from bringing in an outside force and also for the fact that "a man who conspires against a popular prince must also be fearful after his crime is committed

...

...

Download as:   txt (8.3 Kb)   pdf (103.7 Kb)   docx (12.3 Kb)  
Continue for 6 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com
Citation Generator

(2010, 11). A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moore's Utopia and Machiavelli's the Prince. ReviewEssays.com. Retrieved 11, 2010, from https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/A-Compare-and-Contrast-of-Thomas-Moore's-Utopia/14352.html

"A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moore's Utopia and Machiavelli's the Prince" ReviewEssays.com. 11 2010. 2010. 11 2010 <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/A-Compare-and-Contrast-of-Thomas-Moore's-Utopia/14352.html>.

"A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moore's Utopia and Machiavelli's the Prince." ReviewEssays.com. ReviewEssays.com, 11 2010. Web. 11 2010. <https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/A-Compare-and-Contrast-of-Thomas-Moore's-Utopia/14352.html>.

"A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moore's Utopia and Machiavelli's the Prince." ReviewEssays.com. 11, 2010. Accessed 11, 2010. https://www.reviewessays.com/essay/A-Compare-and-Contrast-of-Thomas-Moore's-Utopia/14352.html.